Nor is it a retroactive endorsement of the strict economic lockdown approach the United States imposed during the first six months of the pandemic. The study, published in PLOS One, should not be used to justify more lockdown measures, Yakusheva said. In this video, Olga Yakusheva, associate professor of nursing, discusses the study’s findings. A quality adjusted life year is one year of life in perfect health. This is because many of the people saved were high-risk older adults with multiple illnesses and fewer healthy years left to live, while those most affected by the economy were younger people in service jobs and other lower-paying occupations who found themselves without employer-provided health insurance and, in many cases, unable to pay for health care or even life-saving medications. quality-adjusted life years lost (2,093,811 to 8,858,444) due to the economic downturn. However, the results are more ambiguous when looking at the quality-adjusted life expectancy added by lockdown (4,886,214 to 9,650,886) vs. The study found that from March through August 2020, implementing widespread lockdowns and other mitigation in the United States potentially saved more lives (866,350 to 1,711,150) than the number of lives potentially lost (57,922 to 245,055) that were attributable to the economic downturn. People can check with their providers for more information, as there's no one-size-fits-all answer.A new University of Michigan-led study shows the lockdowns implemented in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic saved lives - but the decision to use lockdowns is much more nuanced and the research shouldn’t be used to justify lockdowns now or to retroactively endorse that approach, said health economist Olga Yakusheva, associate professor of nursing at the School of Nursing. Telehealth access remains through MedicareĬongress moved to ensure telehealth access for all Medicare recipients for the next two years, so the audio and video visits that those patients have come to rely on are not threatened by the end of the emergency.Īs for people on private insurance, telehealth access will depend on state laws and insurance company policies. Because of work in Congress and by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, COVID-19 vaccines are mandated to be covered by insurance - through the end of the public health emergency and even once the government stops buying and distributing them for free. "And then people may not want to seek health care because they are afraid of paying some sort of copay or being saddled with a huge bill."īut vaccines will remain free for people with insurance. "All of a sudden, you have to be paying for copays and office visits, or even lab tests," he added. "The federal declaration has big implications, mainly financial, that many people don't even realize," Chin-Hong said. Jen Kates, senior vice president of the nonpartisan nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF), called the end of the emergencies "symbolically a big change." But she and other experts also noted that it will still alter systems that people have come to rely on without realizing they were temporary, at the same time that experts caution it's unclear what the future will hold. The threat of the virus has also receded for many Americans, thanks to testing, treatments and vaccines. has high levels of immunity from previous vaccinations or infections, and the omicron subvariants that are circulating are producing milder disease. adding to a toll of more than 1 million - public health experts say the Biden administration is likely looking to end the national and public health emergencies related to COVID-19 because the U.S. While hundreds of COVID-19 deaths are still reported each day in the U.S. will no longer officially be in a COVID-19 emergency for the first time since the pandemic began three years ago.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |